Homeland Security Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Homeland Security - Essay mannikinThis essay, this reaction paper, will argue that these call need to be define rattling specifically and very deliberately otherwise, it persists as a vague concept capable of being used as confession for nearly any action. More specifically, this paper will argue that homeland ought to be defined to imply a variety of harmonious interests and that security ought to be defined as actions and policies designed to accomplish their objectives with the to the lowest degree amount of intrusion into the affairs of individual give ins and into the lives of individuals or businesses.As an initial matter, homeland should include a variety of interests more particularly, it should refer to the nation, the states, and to individuals. There should be no ranking of these homeland types in terms of significance that means that national interests should non be placed above state interests through this extra- inbuilt concept, and that individuals should not be granted a higher status than they are already accorded under traditional notions of constitutional jurisprudence. A framework for allocating powers and rights already exists in the constitution the mere notion of a recently defined homeland being promulgated in haphazard fashion and zealously guarded sounds forebodingly like an go about to subvert constitutional principles through non-constitutional means. A great deal has been made about protecting life-sustaining homeland sites, such as those related to infrastructure, finance, and military readiness. The homeland also includes lesser constituent part of the country, such as in Louisiana, which were devastated by the hurricanes recently. There ought to be a uniform approach to formation the homeland, whether is the Pentagon, the Federal Reserve Bank, Louisiana, or Mr. and Mrs. Smiths family farm. My sense, my reaction, is that the homeland portion of the concept prioritizes national aspects while minimizing or ignoring stat e and individual aspects. This would be a dangerous deviation from the constitutional principles upon which this country was founded as a result, that would retrace Homeland Security a direct threat to the system of governance established by the American constitution. In addition, the security aspect of the concept is also vague and seemingly unlimited. Is security meant to be proactive or reactive Is it meant to stifle otherwise protected types of speech and protests in order to prevent whatever potential negative outcome The Central Intelligence Agency and the American military have traditionally been vested with duties dealing with international affairs. The CIA is no more allowed to spy on American soil than are American soldiers allowed to engage in domestic law enforcement activities. And, yet, as security implies both the gathering of intelligence and the mobilization of physical forces to deter any potential attack, whom else would be involved in maintaining American secu rity if not these organizations This raises troubling issues. Does this notion of security mean