NGOs and Corporations Literature review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

NGOs and Corporations - Literature review ExampleHe negotiated a partnership between the conception Wildlife Fund (WWF) one of the worlds largest and most influential NGOs, and the IMD, but he is also severely involved in the corporation side of his research interests. He acts as a consultant for round(prenominal) Fortune 100 companies, including Microsoft and Shell, and has spoken at various think-tanks. Yaziji and Doh adopt a sensible component part of their domesticate into four clear sections understanding NGOs, NGO advocacy campaigns, corporate-NGO engagements, and the future of the latter. This division offers a reproducible structure for the books chapters, and a straightforward framework for analysis. The authors begin by asserting the richness of NGOs in the contemporary world, and on this issue, their arguments can scarcely be contested. By naming just a few of the more prominent organisations, including Amnesty International and Greenpeace the nature of NGOs as m ajor actors in politics, economic science and society is clear. Yaziji and Doh (2009, p.xiii) also provide few staggering statistics for the growth of NGOs in recent years, suggesting a 400% increase in the number of international NGOs. No reader can seriously surmise whether a comprehensive work on this subject was necessary. I would credit the authors statement that A filled understanding of the role of business in society requires a comprehensive understanding of these engagements (2009, p.xv). oweHowe And Doh and Yaziji for sure provide a comprehensive account. They apply a logical division of material, and create a work which is easy for any reader to negotiate. However, having set themselves the important task of filling the current gap in the literature, something more than a survey of the field would have been appropriate. In theoretical terms, they have moved on the debate, but to a great extent the book feels like a synthesis rather than a useful new analytical framew ork. The introductory chapter provides a valuable overview of the current status of NGOs and their influence in society, and sets out a valid framework for the analysis that will be pursued throughout the text. However, beyond the introductory chapter and the logical headings used to divide the work into four main areas, in that location are some crucial structural weaknesses. In the introductory chapter, the authors describe the hazard-strewn nature of relationships between NGOs and corporations, nicely summarise some of the key factors that make them so (2009, p.xxiv). For example, NGOs might recoil from the data discovered on being habituated access to a corporations internal audit, while the media coverage generated by such a collaboration has the potential to harm the legitimacy and reputation of an NGO, sometimes damaging it irreparably. Perhaps most fundamentally, there is a basic value difference between most corporations, and most NGOs. The former are works with markets a nd their values the latter with social and ethical values. There can be some overlap in their operations, but this fundamental conflict compromises all collaborations. Perhaps this theme could have been developed further, given that it crops up throughout